SCIENTIFIC HUB

Araştırmanın izini sürün.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Levodopa-Karbidopa Bağırsak Jelinin İyileştirilmiş Tıbbi Tedaviyle Karşılaştırılmasının İleri Parkinson Hastalığında Motor Olmayan Belirtiler Üzerindeki Etkileri: INSIGHTS Çalışması.

Effects of Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel Compared with Optimized Medical Treatment on Nonmotor Symptoms in Advanced Parkinson's Disease: INSIGHTS Study.

Makine çevirisi · Editoryal inceleme bekliyor

Parkinsons Dis · 2022-11-04

DOI: 10.1155/2022/1216975PMID: 36388237

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleKaynağa git ↗

Araştırma özeti

Aşağıdaki metin kaynak makalenin lisansı doğrulanmış orijinal özetidir. cc by

BackgroundNonmotor symptoms (NMS) are common in advanced Parkinson's disease (APD) and reduce health-related quality of life.ObjectiveThe aim of the study was to evaluate levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) versus optimized medical treatment (OMT) on NMS in APD.MethodsINSIGHTS was a phase 3b, open-label, randomized, multicenter study in patients with APD (LCIG or OMT, 26 weeks) (NCT02549092). Primary outcomes assessed were total NMS (NMS scale (NMSS) and PD sleep scale (PDSS-2)). Key secondary outcomes included the Unified PD Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part II, Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C), and PD Questionnaire-8 (PDQ-8). Additional secondary measures of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), King's PD Pain Scale (KPPS), and Parkinson Anxiety Scale (PAS) also were evaluated. Finally, safety was assessed.ResultsOut of 89 patients randomized, 87 were included in the analysis (LCIG, n = 43; OMT, n = 44). There were no significant differences in NMSS or PDSS-2 total score changes (baseline to Week 26) between LCIG and OMT; within-group changes were significant for NMSS (LCIG, p p = 0.005) and PDSS-2 (LCIG, p p p = 0.006) and CGI-C (p p p n = 2) and stoma-site infection (n = 2) (LCIG).ConclusionsThere were no significant differences between LCIG versus OMT in NMSS or PDSS-2; both LCIG and OMT groups significantly improved from baseline. AEs were consistent with the known safety profile.

Bilimsel değerlendirme

01

Araştırma sorusu

Sorunun kapsamı orijinal çalışma üzerinden değerlendirilir.

02

Yöntem ve örneklem

Çalışma tasarımı ve örneklem için kaynak makaleyi kontrol edin.

03

Temel bulgular

Bu kayıt için editoryal olarak onaylanmış bulgu özeti henüz yayımlanmadı.

04

Sınırlılıklar

Sonuçların genellenebilirliği, yanlılık ve klinik anlamı ayrıca incelenmelidir.

Bibliyografik veriden yöntem, örneklem veya klinik sonuç çıkarımı yapılmaz.