Araştırma özeti
Aşağıdaki metin kaynak makalenin lisansı doğrulanmış orijinal özetidir. cc by
BackgroundThe Movement Disorders Society (MDS)-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) is increasingly used to assess motor dysfunction before and after subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS).ObjectivesWe, therefore, investigated whether the MDS-UPDRS can detect longitudinal changes in motor function after STN-DBS in the same way as UPDRS.MethodsWe examined 21 patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) (mean age 59.2 ± 10.6 years, mean disease duration 12.0 ± 3.0 years) who underwent STN-DBS and whose motor functions were assessed by the UPDRS and MDS-UPDRS before, 3 months after, and 1 year after STN-DBS. We then evaluated the consistency between the scores of Parts II and III of the UPDRS and MDS-UPDRS during the off phase using Lin's concordance coefficient (LCC) and a Bland-Altman plot.ResultsThe scores of Parts II and III of both the UPDRS and MDS-UPDRS were significantly decreased 3 months and 1 year after STN-DBS during the off phase. Scores of the UPDRS and MDS-UPDRS showed significant positive correlations before and after STN-DBS. We calculated estimated MDS-UPDRS scores from the UPDRS scores using a regression line and calculated the LCC between the MDS-UPDRS and the estimated MDS-UPDRS scores. The LCC value was 0.59-0.91, which suggests a relatively high consistency between the UPDRS and MDS-UPDRS. The Bland-Altman plot showed that differences between both scores were basically within ±1.96 standard deviations of the difference.ConclusionThe present preliminary study indicated that the utility of the MDS-UPDRS in evaluating motor function before and after STN-DBS demonstrates its potential equivalency to the UPDRS.
Bilimsel değerlendirme
Araştırma sorusu
Sorunun kapsamı orijinal çalışma üzerinden değerlendirilir.
Yöntem ve örneklem
Çalışma tasarımı ve örneklem için kaynak makaleyi kontrol edin.
Temel bulgular
Bu kayıt için editoryal olarak onaylanmış bulgu özeti henüz yayımlanmadı.
Sınırlılıklar
Sonuçların genellenebilirliği, yanlılık ve klinik anlamı ayrıca incelenmelidir.
Bibliyografik veriden yöntem, örneklem veya klinik sonuç çıkarımı yapılmaz.