Parkinson hastalığında derin beyin stimülasyonu: çerçeve tabanlı, çerçevesiz ve çerçevesiz fiducial-less tekniklerin doğruluk ve klinik sonuçlarının karşılaştırılması.

Araştırma özeti

Aşağıdaki metin kaynak makalenin lisansı doğrulanmış orijinal özetidir. cc by

BackgroundThe effectiveness of deep brain stimulation (DBS) for Parkinson's disease (PD) depends on implantation accuracy. DBS initially employed a stereotactic frame (frame-based, FB), but technological advancements led to the development of less invasive methods based on fiducial markers (F + F) or intraoperative imaging (F-F). This study compares the accuracy and efficacy of three DBS-STN implantation techniques.MethodsThis retrospective study involved 18 patients with PD who underwent bilateral STN DBS between 2018 and 2023. Patients were divided into three groups: FB (n = 6), F + F (n = 7), and F-F (n = 5). Postoperative CT and preoperative MRI fusion were used to evaluate electrode accuracy via deviations from planned targets in x, y, z axes, and calculate the radial error (RE) and vector error (VE). We analyzed Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) III scores in four "on/off medication-stimulation" combinations, LEDD, and disease stage before DBS, and 3 and 12 months post-DBS.ResultsNo statistically significant differences were observed between the three methods in|Δx| (FB = 1.30 ± 0.91; F + F = 1.05 ± 0.93; F-F = 1.33 ± 1.09 mm),|Δy| (FB = 0.95 ± 0.98; F + F = 1.11 ± 1.17; F-F = 1.28 ± 1.14 mm), RE (FB = 1.82 ± 0.29; F + F = 1,71 ± 0,36; F-F = 1,91 ± 1,49 mm) and VE (FB = 3,14 ± 0,35 mm; F + F = 4,92 ± 0,54 mm; F-F = 4,42 ± 1,22 mm). All groups demonstrated significant UPDRS III (> 50%) and LEDD reduction (> 40%) at 12 months, with no intergroup differences.ConclusionsThe study concludes that all three techniques provide equivalent accuracy and clinical efficacy. Centers should select DBS-STN methods based on available resources and expertise.

İlgili konular