Araştırma özeti
Aşağıdaki metin kaynak makalenin lisansı doğrulanmış orijinal özetidir. cc by
BackgroundAnxiety often exacerbates freezing of gait (FOG) in people with Parkinson's (PwP). Anxiety-related attentional processes and associated processing inefficiencies, like conscious movement processing (CMP) and ruminations, can substantially impact movement control. However, their impact on FOG remains largely unexplored.ObjectiveTo validate an adapted 10-item (1-5 Likert scale) Gait-Specific Attentional Profile (G-SAP) in PwP and assess if adapted G-SAP-subscales (Physiological Arousal, CMP, Rumination, and Processing Inefficiencies) are associated with self-reported FOG frequency.MethodsWe recruited 440 PwP (Mage = 65.5 ± 8.7; 5.8 ± 5.0 years since diagnosis) across the UK. Participants completed the adapted G-SAP and questionnaires on demographics, medical background, and FOG frequency. We assessed adapted G-SAP's internal consistency, structural validity, and subscale scores associations with FOG frequency.ResultsThe adapted G-SAP showed acceptable internal consistency (α≥0.66) and acceptable/good model fit (comparative fit index = 0.976). Physiological Arousal and CMP subscale scores presented weaker correlations for PwP with FOG (PwP + FOG, r = 0.52) compared to PwP without FOG (PwP-FOG, r = 0.77; p = 0.006). Higher Rumination (OR: 1.323, 95%CI: [1.214-1.440]) and Physiological Arousal (OR: 1.195, 95%CI:[1.037-1.377]) were significantly associated with higher FOG frequency, controlling for age, time since diagnosis and balance/gait problems.ConclusionsThe adapted G-SAP is reliable and convenient to measure and identify potentially maladaptive anxiety-related attentional processes that may impact FOG. Results suggest that PwP who experience more worrisome thoughts and greater physiological arousal in daily life are likelier to freeze. Compared to PwP-FOG, for PwP + FOG high physiological arousal was associated with reduced goal-directed focus of attention. Future research will determine if this is a causal risk factor.
Bilimsel değerlendirme
Araştırma sorusu
Sorunun kapsamı orijinal çalışma üzerinden değerlendirilir.
Yöntem ve örneklem
Çalışma tasarımı ve örneklem için kaynak makaleyi kontrol edin.
Temel bulgular
Bu kayıt için editoryal olarak onaylanmış bulgu özeti henüz yayımlanmadı.
Sınırlılıklar
Sonuçların genellenebilirliği, yanlılık ve klinik anlamı ayrıca incelenmelidir.
Bibliyografik veriden yöntem, örneklem veya klinik sonuç çıkarımı yapılmaz.