SCIENTIFIC HUB

Araştırmanın izini sürün.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Parkinson hastalığını depresyonla tedavi etmek için transkraniyal manyetik stimülasyonun farklı modalitelerinin karşılaştırmalı etkinliği: sistematik bir inceleme ve ağ meta-analizi.

Comparative efficacy of different modalities of transcranial magnetic stimulation for treating Parkinson's disease with depression: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Makine çevirisi · Editoryal inceleme bekliyor

Front Neurol · 2025-07-31

DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1627932PMID: 40823301

Open accessSystematic Review; systematic-review; Journal ArticleKaynağa git ↗

Araştırma özeti

Aşağıdaki metin kaynak makalenin lisansı doğrulanmış orijinal özetidir. cc by

ObjectiveParkinson's disease (PD) is a prevalent neurodegenerative disorder. However, systematic comparisons of various transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) modalities for treating depression in patients with PD remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic effects of different TMS modalities on depression in patients with PD.MethodsA systematic search following PRISMA guidelines was conducted in the following databases: Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang, VIP, and CBM, covering literature up to April 1, 2025. Included studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating TMS interventions in PD patients with depression. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 (ROB 2.0) tool. Comparative effectiveness analysis was conducted using STATA 17.0.ResultsA total of thirty-five RCTs involving 2,353 participants were included, evaluating high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (HF-rTMS) and low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (LF-rTMS) compared to sham stimulation and conventional rehabilitation therapy (CRT). The results showed that LF-rTMS [standardized mean difference (SMD) = -2.46, 95% confidence interval (-3.62, -1.29)], HF-rTMS [SMD = -2.05, 95% CI (-3.16, -0.94)] significantly improved depressive symptoms.ConclusionThe network meta-analysis indicates that both HF-rTMS and LF-rTMS may be considered as effective adjunctive therapy to improve depression in patients with PD, with LF-rTMS potentially showing superior efficacy in improving depressive symptoms. Parameters, such as total pulses no more than 1,200, may optimize outcomes. However, further high-quality RCTs are required to validate these findings and refine optimal treatment protocols.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42024564867.

Bilimsel değerlendirme

01

Araştırma sorusu

Sorunun kapsamı orijinal çalışma üzerinden değerlendirilir.

02

Yöntem ve örneklem

Çalışma tasarımı ve örneklem için kaynak makaleyi kontrol edin.

03

Temel bulgular

Bu kayıt için editoryal olarak onaylanmış bulgu özeti henüz yayımlanmadı.

04

Sınırlılıklar

Sonuçların genellenebilirliği, yanlılık ve klinik anlamı ayrıca incelenmelidir.

Bibliyografik veriden yöntem, örneklem veya klinik sonuç çıkarımı yapılmaz.