Araştırma özeti
Aşağıdaki metin kaynak makalenin lisansı doğrulanmış orijinal özetidir. cc by
Background/Objectives: Non-invasive methods for evaluating rehabilitation outcomes in Parkinson's disease (PD) remain limited. This preliminary study proposes a mechanics-informed machine learning (ML) framework integrating force-plate data with dimensionality reduction, clustering, and statistical analysis to objectively assess motor control and the effects of a targeted intervention. Methods: Twelve PD patients were randomly assigned to a PD control group performing standard exercises or an intervention group incorporating additional transverse-plane trunk motion exercises for 10 weeks. Ground reaction forces and center of pressure (COP) signals were recorded pre- and post-intervention using a force plate, alongside data from six healthy individuals as a benchmark. Features related to postural sway and COP dynamics were extracted and refined using Forward Feature Selection. Dimensionality reduction (t-SNE) and unsupervised clustering (K-means) identified group-level patterns. SHAP values and Cohen's d quantified feature importance and effect size. Clustering robustness was assessed with bootstrapping, nested cross-validation, and permutation testing. Results: K-means clustering revealed clear pre/post-intervention separation in five of six intervention patients, with post-intervention states shifting toward the control cluster. Clustering showed strong performance (Silhouette 0.77-0.79; Calinski-Harabasz 100.8-184.9; Davies-Bouldin 0.29-0.45). The most predictive features (RMS-SML and PL-SAP) showed large effect sizes (Cohen's d = -12.1 and -4.53, respectively) distinguishing PD patients from healthy controls. Traditional statistical tests (e.g., ANOVA) failed to detect within-group changes (p > 0.05), but ML-based methods captured subtle, nonlinear postural adaptations. Conclusions: This preliminary mechanics-informed ML framework detects PD-related motor deficits and rehabilitation-induced improvements using force-plate data, warranting validation in larger cohorts.
Bilimsel değerlendirme
Araştırma sorusu
Sorunun kapsamı orijinal çalışma üzerinden değerlendirilir.
Yöntem ve örneklem
Çalışma tasarımı ve örneklem için kaynak makaleyi kontrol edin.
Temel bulgular
Bu kayıt için editoryal olarak onaylanmış bulgu özeti henüz yayımlanmadı.
Sınırlılıklar
Sonuçların genellenebilirliği, yanlılık ve klinik anlamı ayrıca incelenmelidir.
Bibliyografik veriden yöntem, örneklem veya klinik sonuç çıkarımı yapılmaz.