SCIENTIFIC HUB

Araştırmanın izini sürün.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Tekrarlayan Transkraniyal Manyetik Stimülasyonun Parkinson Hastalığında Gait, Motor Fonksiyonu ve Denge Üzerindeki Etkileri: Randomize Kontrollü Denemelerin Sistematik Bir İncelemesi ve Meta-Analizi.

The Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Gait, Motor Function, and Balance in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Makine çevirisi · Editoryal inceleme bekliyor

J Clin Med · 2025-12-25

DOI: 10.3390/jcm15010166PMID: 41517414

Open accessreview-article; Review; Journal ArticleKaynağa git ↗

Araştırma özeti

Aşağıdaki metin kaynak makalenin lisansı doğrulanmış orijinal özetidir. cc by

Objective: This study aimed to systematically evaluate the therapeutic effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on gait, motor function, and balance in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and identify optimal stimulation parameters for clinical application. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (CTs) was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central, Scopus, and Ovid-LWW were searched until December 2024 for RCTs evaluating the effects of rTMS on PD-related gait, balance, or motor outcomes. Nineteen studies (n = 547) met the inclusion criteria. Data on study characteristics, rTMS protocols (frequency, target area, pulses, session duration, number of sessions, and treatment duration), and outcome measures (freezing of gait questionnaire [FOG-Q], gait speed, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III [UPDRS-III], UPDRS total, and timed up and go [TUG] test) were extracted. Effect sizes (Hedges' g) were pooled using inverse variance meta-analysis, heterogeneity was assessed using I2, and publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and Egger's regression. Results: rTMS produced significant improvements in gait freezing (FOG-Q: g = -0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI] [-1.05, -0.43]; p p p = 0.003). No significant effects were observed for UPDRS total (g = 0.18; p = 0.58) or balance (TUG, g = -0.29; p = 0.06). Egger's test indicated publication bias for gait speed (p = 0.016); however, trim-and-fill imputed zero studies. Subgroup analyses indicated that high-frequency stimulation of the supplementary motor area (SMA) for ≥20 min over 10 sessions (total duration 1000 pulses per session for 20 min over 10 sessions within Conclusions: rTMS exerts moderate and significant benefits on gait and motor performance in PD, particularly when tailored protocols involving SMA or M1 stimulation are employed. High-frequency SMA protocols improve gait speed, whereas low-frequency M1/SMA protocols optimize motor symptom relief. These findings provide evidence-based guidance for rTMS implementation in PD rehabilitation.

Bilimsel değerlendirme

01

Araştırma sorusu

Sorunun kapsamı orijinal çalışma üzerinden değerlendirilir.

02

Yöntem ve örneklem

Çalışma tasarımı ve örneklem için kaynak makaleyi kontrol edin.

03

Temel bulgular

Bu kayıt için editoryal olarak onaylanmış bulgu özeti henüz yayımlanmadı.

04

Sınırlılıklar

Sonuçların genellenebilirliği, yanlılık ve klinik anlamı ayrıca incelenmelidir.

Bibliyografik veriden yöntem, örneklem veya klinik sonuç çıkarımı yapılmaz.