Gait Detection'ın Dondurulması İçin Derin Öğrenme: Çapraz Veri Ayarı Doğrulama, Laboratuvar ve Günlük Yaşam Giyilebilir İzleme Arasındaki Kritik Dağıtım Boşluklarını Ortaya Çıkarıyor.

Araştırma özeti

Aşağıdaki metin kaynak makalenin lisansı doğrulanmış orijinal özetidir. cc by

Freezing of gait (FoG) affects 38-65% of advanced Parkinson's disease patients, yet automated detection algorithms are often validated solely on laboratory datasets. This study quantifies the critical performance gap between laboratory and real-world performance-a prerequisite for clinical deployment. Using temporal convolutional networks (TCNs), we trained models on two public datasets representing ecological extremes: a daily living dataset (Figshare; n = 35, single-sensor) and a laboratory dataset (DAPHNET; n = 10, multi-sensor). We compared five training configurations to address class imbalance. Results showed that F1-based early stopping outperformed Area Under the Curve (AUC)-based stopping by 47% (F1: 0.55 vs. 0.37, p = 0.0008). Combining multiple imbalance corrections (focal loss, weighting, sampling) paradoxically degraded precision to 33% due to a ~60-fold over-weighting of the minority class. Most importantly, cross-dataset validation revealed an 83% performance gap: laboratory F1 reached 0.9999 ± 0.0002, whereas daily living F1 dropped to 0.55 ± 0.26 (p < 0.0001), with a 1299-fold increase in variance. These findings demonstrate that laboratory success does not guarantee real-world utility. We propose that the observed gap represents a "deployment gap" reflecting the combined influence of environmental complexity, sensor constraints, and physiological variability. These results provide an empirical framework for evaluating deployment readiness of wearable FoG detection systems and offer concrete training strategy recommendations for clinical translation.

İlgili konular