SCIENTIFIC HUB

Araştırmanın izini sürün.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Parkinson Hastalığında Denge ve Hareketlilik için Hareket Sensörü Telerehabilitasyonunun Etkinliği: Rasgele Olmayan Kontrollü Pilot Çalışması.

Efficacy of Motion Sensor Telerehabilitation for Balance and Mobility in Parkinson's Disease: A Nonrandomized Controlled Pilot Study.

Makine çevirisi · Editoryal inceleme bekliyor

Int J Telemed Appl · 2026-02-25

DOI: 10.1155/ijta/7191579PMID: 41756104

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleKaynağa git ↗

Araştırma özeti

Aşağıdaki metin kaynak makalenin lisansı doğrulanmış orijinal özetidir. cc by

PurposeWe developed an innovative telerehabilitation system using a 3D camera with motion sensors that provided real-time feedback. This study is aimed at evaluating its efficacy in improving balance, gait, and mobility, as well as its feasibility in patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD).Materials and methodsParticipants with idiopathic PD self-selected into either a telerehabilitation (tele) group or a hospital-based rehabilitation (hospital) group. The tele group received two initial sessions of hospital-based rehabilitation sessions, followed by 14 telerehabilitation sessions using the innovative system. The hospital group received 16 sessions of hospital-based rehabilitation. Outcome measures included Berg Balance Scale (BBS) score, Chula Parkinson Mobility Scale (Chula PMS) score, gait speed, and step length. The feasibility of the telerehabilitation system was also assessed.ResultsForty-six participants were recruited (tele group: n = 23; hospital group: n = 23). Both groups showed statistically significant improvements in the BBS scores (tele: post-pre = 3.50, p p p = 0.454). Chula PMS score also improved significantly in both groups (tele: post-pre = 3.45, p p p = 0.086). The attendance rate exceeded 90% in both groups.ConclusionsThe motion sensor telerehabilitation significantly improved balance and mobility in PD patients with no statistically significant differences between the two groups. Feasibility was high. However, the BBS improvements did not reach the minimal clinically important difference, indicating the need for further investigation.Trial registrationThai Clinical Trials Registry identifier: TCTR 20220924001.

Bilimsel değerlendirme

01

Araştırma sorusu

Sorunun kapsamı orijinal çalışma üzerinden değerlendirilir.

02

Yöntem ve örneklem

Çalışma tasarımı ve örneklem için kaynak makaleyi kontrol edin.

03

Temel bulgular

Bu kayıt için editoryal olarak onaylanmış bulgu özeti henüz yayımlanmadı.

04

Sınırlılıklar

Sonuçların genellenebilirliği, yanlılık ve klinik anlamı ayrıca incelenmelidir.

Bibliyografik veriden yöntem, örneklem veya klinik sonuç çıkarımı yapılmaz.