SCIENTIFIC HUB

Araştırmanın izini sürün.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Parkinson hastalığı gerçek hayat sağlık kuruluşu veritabanında: ilaç bazlı bir algoritma.

Parkinson's disease in real life healthcare organization database: a medication-based algorithm.

Makine çevirisi · Editoryal inceleme bekliyor

BMC Neurol · 2026-03-27

DOI: 10.1186/s12883-026-04840-6PMID: 41888757

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleKaynağa git ↗

Araştırma özeti

Aşağıdaki metin kaynak makalenin lisansı doğrulanmış orijinal özetidir. cc by

BACKGROUND: Accurate identification of Parkinson’s disease (PD) in large electronic health record (EHR) population-based databases is challenging due to diagnostic heterogeneity in routine care, with a substantial proportion of individuals diagnosed with PD had not been diagnosed by a specialist. Our aim was to develop and validate a simplified rule-based medication algorithm to identify PD in a nationwide healthcare registry and apply it to estimate long-term incidence, prevalence, and pre-diagnostic diagnoses. METHODS: Using Clalit Health Services EHR data covering over five million individuals (2005–2025), we constructed a medication-based algorithm incorporating predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria and two levels of diagnostic certainty (probable/possible PD). Validation was performed against two independent specialist-confirmed PD cohorts and FDOPA PET/CT and a non-PD neurological cohort. Incidence rates per 100,000 were calculated annually with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) assuming a Poisson distribution. Age-adjusted incidence rates were computed using the WHO standard population. motor and non-motor diagnoses preceding PD were examined up to 18 years before the index date using matched controls. RESULTS: The algorithm identified 34,368 PD patients (56.5% male; mean age at index 75.2 ± 10.5 years). Sensitivity was 94.8% (95% CI 90.4–97.2) in the FDOPA PET/CT cohort, 94.8% (95% CI 92.1–96.6) in the private clinic cohort, and 94.7% (95% CI 90.9–96.9) in the movement disorder clinic cohort. Specificity was 85.2% (95% CI 77.8–90.6). Incidence increased markedly with age but declined significantly over time (overall annual percent change [APC] - 4.47%, 95% CI -4.90 – -4.03). Age-adjusted incidence rates (≥20 years) declined 2.4-fold between 2005 and 2024 (55 [95% CI 53–58] to 23 [95% CI 21–24] per 100,000). Overall prevalence declined modestly (APC -0.78%, 95% CI -0.84 – -0.72), with increases in younger age groups and declines in older groups. Constipation, depression, and tremor diagnoses were more frequent years before diagnosis, whereas smoking-related codes were less frequent among future PD patients. CONCLUSIONS: This validated medication-based algorithm provides a reproducible framework for PD identification in large registries. Applied over two decades in a nationwide cohort, it demonstrated high diagnostic performance and revealed age-dependent declines in PD incidence alongside heterogeneous prevalence trends.

Bilimsel değerlendirme

01

Araştırma sorusu

Sorunun kapsamı orijinal çalışma üzerinden değerlendirilir.

02

Yöntem ve örneklem

Çalışma tasarımı ve örneklem için kaynak makaleyi kontrol edin.

03

Temel bulgular

Bu kayıt için editoryal olarak onaylanmış bulgu özeti henüz yayımlanmadı.

04

Sınırlılıklar

Sonuçların genellenebilirliği, yanlılık ve klinik anlamı ayrıca incelenmelidir.

Bibliyografik veriden yöntem, örneklem veya klinik sonuç çıkarımı yapılmaz.