SCIENTIFIC HUB

Araştırmanın izini sürün.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Association of the Naples prognostic score with Parkinson disease risk: a prospective cohort study.

Front Aging Neurosci · 2026-04-30

DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2026.1809301PMID: 42147459

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleKaynağa git ↗

Araştırma özeti

Aşağıdaki metin kaynak makalenin lisansı doğrulanmış orijinal özetidir. cc by

BackgroundThe Naples prognostic score (NPS), derived from routine inflammatory and nutritional biomarkers, reflects systemic immune-metabolic status. Its prospective association with Parkinson disease (PD) risk has not been well established.MethodsWe analyzed 317,035 UK Biobank participants recruited in 2006-2010 who were free of PD and malignancy at baseline and had complete NPS component data. NPS was derived from serum albumin, total cholesterol, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio. Incident PD through 31 December 2022 was identified using a validated algorithm. Associations were examined using Cox proportional hazards models with multivariable adjustment.ResultsOver a median follow-up of 13.94 years, 2,298 participants (0.72%) developed PD. Higher NPS was significantly associated with increased PD risk. After multivariable adjustment, each 1-point increase in NPS corresponded to a 13% higher risk (Model 2 adjusted HR = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.07-1.19, p p p for trend ConclusionIn this large prospective cohort, higher NPS was independently associated with increased PD risk. These findings support the potential role of integrated inflammatory-nutritional status in PD development and suggest that NPS may serve as a readily available marker for risk stratification.

Bilimsel değerlendirme

01

Araştırma sorusu

Sorunun kapsamı orijinal çalışma üzerinden değerlendirilir.

02

Yöntem ve örneklem

Çalışma tasarımı ve örneklem için kaynak makaleyi kontrol edin.

03

Temel bulgular

Bu kayıt için editoryal olarak onaylanmış bulgu özeti henüz yayımlanmadı.

04

Sınırlılıklar

Sonuçların genellenebilirliği, yanlılık ve klinik anlamı ayrıca incelenmelidir.

Bibliyografik veriden yöntem, örneklem veya klinik sonuç çıkarımı yapılmaz.