Araştırma özeti
Aşağıdaki metin kaynak makalenin lisansı doğrulanmış orijinal özetidir. cc by
BackgroundFreezing of gait is among the most disabling motor complications of Parkinson's disease, markedly increasing fall risk and reducing quality of life. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation has emerged as a non-invasive neuromodulation approach; however, evidence regarding its efficacy for freezing of gait remains heterogeneous and inconclusive.ObjectivesTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for freezing of gait and motor outcomes in Parkinson's disease.MethodsA systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD420261285716). PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched through January 2026 for randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome was freezing of gait severity measured by the Freezing of Gait Questionnaire. Pooled standardized mean differences were calculated using random-effects modeling.ResultsTwelve randomized controlled trials comprising 293 participants were included. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation significantly improved freezing of gait severity as measured by the Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (standardized mean difference = -0.97, 95% confidence interval - 1.39 to -0.55; p ConclusionsRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation significantly improves freezing of gait and motor performance in Parkinson's disease, representing a safe and promising adjunctive therapy for gait disturbances refractory to conventional treatment. Future large-scale trials with standardized protocols are needed to confirm long-term efficacy.
Bilimsel değerlendirme
Araştırma sorusu
Sorunun kapsamı orijinal çalışma üzerinden değerlendirilir.
Yöntem ve örneklem
Çalışma tasarımı ve örneklem için kaynak makaleyi kontrol edin.
Temel bulgular
Bu kayıt için editoryal olarak onaylanmış bulgu özeti henüz yayımlanmadı.
Sınırlılıklar
Sonuçların genellenebilirliği, yanlılık ve klinik anlamı ayrıca incelenmelidir.
Bibliyografik veriden yöntem, örneklem veya klinik sonuç çıkarımı yapılmaz.