SCIENTIFIC HUB

Araştırmanın izini sürün.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Profile and outcomes of Parkinson's disease deep brain stimulation in a public tertiary center in Brazil: retrospective cohort.

Arq Neuropsiquiatr · 2026-06-01

DOI: 10.1055/s-0046-1825523PMID: 42480619

Open accessresearch-article; Journal Article; Observational StudyKaynağa git ↗

Araştırma özeti

Aşağıdaki metin kaynak makalenin lisansı doğrulanmış orijinal özetidir. cc by

BackgroundDeep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established surgical therapy for advanced Parkinson's disease (PD), but, in Latin America, access remains restricted, and local data are limited.ObjectiveTo describe the demographic, clinical, and procedural profile, as well as the treatment outcomes and perioperative complications, of patients undergoing DBS at a Brazilian reference center.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective observational study including 101 patients with PD who underwent bilateral DBS implantation between 2012 and 2024 at Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Brazil, within the public healthcare system.ResultsThe mean age at surgery was of 62.2 years; 63.4% of the patients were male. The mean ages at symptom onset, diagnosis, DBS indication, and surgery were of 43.1, 45.7, 54.5, and 56.7 years respectively. On average, the patients presented 10.9 years of disease duration when surgery was performed. Motor fluctuations (53.5%) and dyskinesias (41.6%) were the most common indications. The subthalamic nucleus (STN) was the predominant target (97%). Mild complications included wound infection (7.9%), while severe complications, such as lead migration, intracranial hemorrhage, or deep infection occurred in 6.9%. Levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD) was the primary outcome used to assess postoperative change; it was significantly reduced by ∼ 25% after DBS, from 1,885.6 to 1,406.7 mg at 12 months (Wilcoxon p ConclusionIn the cohort of the present study, DBS was safe and enabled a sustained reduction in dopaminergic medication during follow-up. Despite these benefits, delays in surgery, limited access through the public health system, and device-availability issues continue to limit broader implementation, highlighting persistent structural inequalities in Latin America.

Bilimsel değerlendirme

01

Araştırma sorusu

Sorunun kapsamı orijinal çalışma üzerinden değerlendirilir.

02

Yöntem ve örneklem

Çalışma tasarımı ve örneklem için kaynak makaleyi kontrol edin.

03

Temel bulgular

Bu kayıt için editoryal olarak onaylanmış bulgu özeti henüz yayımlanmadı.

04

Sınırlılıklar

Sonuçların genellenebilirliği, yanlılık ve klinik anlamı ayrıca incelenmelidir.

Bibliyografik veriden yöntem, örneklem veya klinik sonuç çıkarımı yapılmaz.