Araştırma özeti
Aşağıdaki metin kaynak makalenin lisansı doğrulanmış orijinal özetidir. cc by
BackgroundFalls are common in people with Parkinson's disease (PD) and are associated with gait impairments, particularly under dual-task conditions. Although gait characteristics differ between fallers and non-fallers, it remains unclear whether walking-related prefrontal cortex (PFC) activity also differs according to fall history. This study compared PFC activity and gait parameters between recurrent fallers (≥2 falls/year) and non-fallers with PD during single- and dual-task walking.MethodsParticipants with PD were classified as non-fallers (n = 34) or recurrent fallers (n = 18). They performed single- and dual-task walking (digit vigilance task) at a self-selected speed. PFC activity was assessed using mobile fNIRS, and gait parameters were obtained using an electronic walkway. A two-way ANOVA examined group and task effects, with task as a repeated measure.ResultsRecurrent fallers exhibited higher PFC activity than non-fallers, regardless of walking task (p = 0.027). A significant group*task interaction was found for step length variability (p = 0.032), with increased variability in fallers during dual-task walking (p = 0.004), but not in non-fallers (p = 0.662). Dual-task walking increased PFC activity, step time, and variability of step length and swing time, while reducing step length, gait velocity, and swing time in both groups (all p ≤ 0.021).ConclusionsRecurrent fallers with PD exhibited greater PFC activity across both walking conditions, which may reflect greater attentional demands and compensatory recruitment of PFC resources. Dual-task walking increased step length variability in recurrent fallers, suggesting that cognitively demanding walking conditions may reveal subtle gait impairments associated with fall history that are not evident during single-task walking.
Bilimsel değerlendirme
Araştırma sorusu
Sorunun kapsamı orijinal çalışma üzerinden değerlendirilir.
Yöntem ve örneklem
Çalışma tasarımı ve örneklem için kaynak makaleyi kontrol edin.
Temel bulgular
Bu kayıt için editoryal olarak onaylanmış bulgu özeti henüz yayımlanmadı.
Sınırlılıklar
Sonuçların genellenebilirliği, yanlılık ve klinik anlamı ayrıca incelenmelidir.
Bibliyografik veriden yöntem, örneklem veya klinik sonuç çıkarımı yapılmaz.