SCIENTIFIC HUB

Araştırmanın izini sürün.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

EIF2S1-PELO insan beyninde eş-ifade mimarisi: eşleme-aile ayrışması, kurucu transkripsiyonel bağlantı ve fonksiyonel katman ayrımını ortaya koymaktadır.

EIF2S1-PELO co-expression architecture in human brain: pairing-family decomposition reveals constitutive transcriptional coupling and functional layer separation.

Makine çevirisi · Editoryal inceleme bekliyor

Front Mol Neurosci · 2026-08-10

DOI: 10.3389/fnmol.2026.1817096PMID: 42639115

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleKaynağa git ↗

Araştırma özeti

Aşağıdaki metin kaynak makalenin lisansı doğrulanmış orijinal özetidir. cc by

EIF2S1 (eIF2α, translation initiation surveillance) and PELO (Pelota, ribosome rescue) operate within established ribosome-associated quality control and translation-initiation surveillance pathways. Direct cross-talk between these systems is mediated through ZAK/GCN-mediated eIF2α phosphorylation under ribosome-stall stress. At the transcriptional layer, however, EIF2S1-PELO co-regulation has not been quantitatively characterized. Using pairing-family architectural decomposition on multi-region GTEx co-expression and BA9 prefrontal cortex RNA-seq from Parkinson's disease and control donors (GSE68719, n = 44 controls, n = 29 PD), we find: (1) EIF2S1 and PELO share near-identical genome-wide co-expression architecture (continuous Weighted Jaccard = 0.914) with substantial top-partner overlap (binary Jaccard at top 5% = 0.490), producing a Type 1 dissociation gap of 0.424, significantly smaller than 200 random gene-pair gaps (mean 0.644, z = -2.57, permutation p = 0.015), and the lowest gap in a 21-pair quality-control gene panel; (2) the relationship is approximately linear-monotonic (Type 6 Pearson-Spearman gap ≈ 0.004); (3) cellular functional co-dependency in DepMap CRISPR screens is essentially zero (Jaccard = 0.006, gene-effect Pearson r = -0.07), consistent with layer separation between regulatory architecture and cellular phenotype; (4) in an exploratory single-cohort comparison of PD versus control prefrontal cortex, the dissociation gap was larger in PD (0.536 versus 0.424 in control), but this between-group difference did not reach statistical significance under a group-label permutation test (p = 0.40; bootstrap 95% CI on the difference [-0.14, 0.29]), so we present it as a hypothesis for replication rather than an established effect. These findings characterize EIF2S1-PELO transcriptional co-regulation as a constitutive architectural feature distinct from the ZAK/GCN-mediated direct mechanism. The constitutive coupling replicated in independent Alzheimer's disease and ALS frontal-cortex cohorts and across microarray and RNA-seq platforms; a disease-associated weakening of the coupling was directionally consistent across all three diseases but did not reach statistical significance. We note that co-expression patterns are consistent with shared upstream regulatory programs but do not by themselves establish direct co-regulation; the architectural findings reported here are correlational at the transcriptional layer.

Bilimsel değerlendirme

01

Araştırma sorusu

Sorunun kapsamı orijinal çalışma üzerinden değerlendirilir.

02

Yöntem ve örneklem

Çalışma tasarımı ve örneklem için kaynak makaleyi kontrol edin.

03

Temel bulgular

Bu kayıt için editoryal olarak onaylanmış bulgu özeti henüz yayımlanmadı.

04

Sınırlılıklar

Sonuçların genellenebilirliği, yanlılık ve klinik anlamı ayrıca incelenmelidir.

Bibliyografik veriden yöntem, örneklem veya klinik sonuç çıkarımı yapılmaz.