SCIENTIFIC HUB

Araştırmanın izini sürün.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Deep Learning-Based Parkinson's Disease Classification Using RGB Plantar Pressure Gait Images: A Comparative Study of CNN and Transformer Architectures.

Diagnostics (Basel) · 2026-09-17

DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics16183021PMID: 42793806

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleKaynağa git ↗

Araştırma özeti

Aşağıdaki metin kaynak makalenin lisansı doğrulanmış orijinal özetidir. cc by

Background/Objectives: Parkinson's disease (PD) is associated with gait abnormalities that provide quantitative information on motor function. This study developed and evaluated a signal-to-image deep learning framework for distinguishing participants with diagnosed PD from healthy controls using plantar pressure gait signals. Methods: VGRF signals from the PhysioNet Gait in Parkinson's Disease Database were transformed into RGB images encoding left-foot pressure, right-foot pressure, and the absolute bilateral difference. ResNet50, EfficientNet-B0, ViT-Tiny, and Swin-Tiny were evaluated at three resolutions and compared with 1D-CNN and BiLSTM baselines. Repeated subject-level five-fold cross-validation with three repetitions and participant-level bootstrap analysis were performed. Results: Among RGB models, ViT-Tiny at 384 × 384 achieved a mean accuracy of 77.64%, F1-score of 82.82%, and AUC of 86.40%. In the Swin-Tiny 384 × 384 ablation, the absolute bilateral-difference representation achieved the highest mean AUC (86.68%). However, its participant-level AUC advantage over RGB was not statistically conclusive (ΔAUC = 0.030, 95% CI: -0.011 to 0.068). Conclusions: Signal-derived gait images provide a feasible approach for PD classification, with bilateral-difference information showing potential discriminative value.

Bilimsel değerlendirme

01

Araştırma sorusu

Sorunun kapsamı orijinal çalışma üzerinden değerlendirilir.

02

Yöntem ve örneklem

Çalışma tasarımı ve örneklem için kaynak makaleyi kontrol edin.

03

Temel bulgular

Bu kayıt için editoryal olarak onaylanmış bulgu özeti henüz yayımlanmadı.

04

Sınırlılıklar

Sonuçların genellenebilirliği, yanlılık ve klinik anlamı ayrıca incelenmelidir.

Bibliyografik veriden yöntem, örneklem veya klinik sonuç çıkarımı yapılmaz.