Araştırma özeti
Aşağıdaki metin kaynak makalenin lisansı doğrulanmış orijinal özetidir. cc by
ObjectivesVisuo-spatial impairment is a common feature in parkinsonian disorders and differentiating idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) from atypical parkinsonian syndromes (APS), i.e. progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), multiple system atrophy (MSA), and corticobasal degeneration (CBD), remains a major clinical challenge. The Qualitative Scoring Pentagon Test (QSPT), derived from the MMSE pentagon-copying item, provides quantitative visuo-constructive assessment but has not been systematically evaluated as a differential marker in parkinsonism. Aim of the study was to assess the discriminative value of the QSPT total score and sub-items across parkinsonian syndromes, and to examine associations with neuropsychological tests, motor severity, and MRI morphometric indices.MethodsPatients with PD and APS were enrolled and underwent clinical and neuropsychological evaluations including MMSE, Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB), Trail Making Test (TMT-A), and MDS-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale-Section III (MDS-UPDRS-III). A group of healthy controls (HC) were also enrolled performing MMSE. Pentagon drawings were scored quantitatively (QSPT). When available, MRI morphometric features were collected. Statistical analysis were performed to assess associations between QSPT, cognitive and clinical features, and to evaluate differences between patients and HC and across patients' groups.ResultsOne-hundred and forty patients (PD=91, PSP=23, MSA=17, CBD=9) and 92 HC were enrolled. QSPT differed significantly considering HC performances (12.7 ± 0.5) versus patients groups, and across groups (pConclusionThis study demonstrates that quantitative scoring of the MMSE pentagon-copying item could differentiate PD from APS. The presence of association between QSPT and MRI brainstem morphometry could also reflect a structural association, specifically identifying tauopathies. QSPT could be a simple and supportive clinical tool, embedded within the MMSE that could differentiates patients from HC and PD from APS.
Bilimsel değerlendirme
Araştırma sorusu
Sorunun kapsamı orijinal çalışma üzerinden değerlendirilir.
Yöntem ve örneklem
Çalışma tasarımı ve örneklem için kaynak makaleyi kontrol edin.
Temel bulgular
Bu kayıt için editoryal olarak onaylanmış bulgu özeti henüz yayımlanmadı.
Sınırlılıklar
Sonuçların genellenebilirliği, yanlılık ve klinik anlamı ayrıca incelenmelidir.
Bibliyografik veriden yöntem, örneklem veya klinik sonuç çıkarımı yapılmaz.