SCIENTIFIC HUB

Araştırmanın izini sürün.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · PPR

Nikotin Pozlama ve Parkinson Hastalığı: Deneysel Kanıtların Sistematik Bir İncelemesi ve Meta-Analizi

Nicotine Exposure and Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Experimental Evidence

Makine çevirisi · Editoryal inceleme bekliyor

· 2025-10-30

DOI: 10.20944/preprints202510.2320.v1

Erişim kaynaktan kontrol edilmeliPreprintKaynağa git ↗

Araştırma özeti

Aşağıdaki metin kaynak makalenin lisansı doğrulanmış orijinal özetidir. cc by

Background: The relationship between nicotine exposure and Parkinson’s disease (PD) remains controversial. Experimental studies, particularly preclinical trials in animal models, suggest that nicotine may exert neuroprotective effects; however, this has not been adequately addressed in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving humans. Methods: Comprehensive searches of PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar identified 1,363 studies, of which 13 met the inclusion criteria. Random-effects meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4 and R 4.1.1. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic, publication bias using funnel plots and Egger’s test, and study quality using SYRCLE and ToxRTool criteria. The review followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420250633808). Results: Nicotine significantly reduced apoptosis (RR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.34–0.71), oxidative stress (RR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.41–0.73), and neuroinflammation (RR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.49–0.79), while enhancing dopaminergic neuron survival (RR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.35–2.06), mitochondrial function (RR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.12–2.14), synaptic protein expression (RR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.14–2.04), and dendritic spine density (RR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.19–1.83). The only human randomized trial showed no clinical benefit (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.84–1.49). Subgroup and meta-regression analyses identified study design, dose, duration, and model type as sources of heterogeneity. Our findings suggest that although nicotine shows preclinical promise, clinical efficacy remains unproven. Conclusion: Experimental evidence suggests that nicotine exposure confers neuroprotection against PD, however, clinical efficacy remains unproven, underscoring the need for large-scale mechanistic and translational studies to establish causal relationships in humans.

Bilimsel değerlendirme

01

Araştırma sorusu

Sorunun kapsamı orijinal çalışma üzerinden değerlendirilir.

02

Yöntem ve örneklem

Çalışma tasarımı ve örneklem için kaynak makaleyi kontrol edin.

03

Temel bulgular

Bu kayıt için editoryal olarak onaylanmış bulgu özeti henüz yayımlanmadı.

04

Sınırlılıklar

Sonuçların genellenebilirliği, yanlılık ve klinik anlamı ayrıca incelenmelidir.

Bibliyografik veriden yöntem, örneklem veya klinik sonuç çıkarımı yapılmaz.