SCIENTIFIC HUB

Araştırmanın izini sürün.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · PPR

Parkinson Hastalığında Subtalamik Nükleus Derin Beyin Stimülasyonundan Sonra Frontal Lobe Fonksiyonu, Küresel Biliş ve 5 Yıllık Yutma Bozukluğu: retrospektif bir kohort çalışması

Frontal Lobe Function, Global Cognition, and 5-Year Swallowing Deterioration After Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson’s Disease : a retrospective cohort study

Makine çevirisi · Editoryal inceleme bekliyor

· 2026-06-08

DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-9783502/v1

Erişim kaynaktan kontrol edilmeliPreprintKaynağa git ↗

Araştırma özeti

Aşağıdaki metin kaynak makalenin lisansı doğrulanmış orijinal özetidir. cc by

Abstract BACKGROUND Dysphagia in Parkinson’s disease (PD) increases aspiration pneumonia risk and is associated with poor prognosis. Although subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) effectively treats motor symptoms, dysphagia often persists or progresses postoperatively. The role of preoperative cognitive function in long-term swallowing outcomes remains unclear. We investigated whether preoperative cognitive function, particularly frontal-executive function, is associated with swallowing outcomes 5 years after STN-DBS. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 68 patients with PD who underwent STN-DBS and completed 5-year follow-up. Frontal-executive function was assessed using the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) and global cognition using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Swallowing deterioration was defined as a ≥ 1-point increase over 5 years on the swallowing-related item of the UPDRS or MDS-UPDRS Part II. FAB (primary exposure) and MMSE (pre-specified secondary exposure) were modeled as dichotomized variables (FAB Results At 5 years, 34 patients (50.0%) showed swallowing deterioration. In primary dichotomized analyses, low-FAB patients had higher adjusted odds than high-FAB patients (OR 2.90, 95% CI 0.74–12.96), whereas MMSE-defined cognitive impairment yielded an estimate close to the null (OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.13–11.9). Continuous sensitivity analyses yielded similar adjusted odds per one-point decrease for FAB (OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.94–1.47) and MMSE (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.89–1.49). The two scales differed structurally in preoperative variance: MMSE was compressed against its ceiling (median 29, upper quartile 30 = maximum), whereas FAB retained discriminative range (median 15, upper quartile 16, maximum 18). Conclusions Point estimates indicated elevated odds of long-term post-DBS swallowing deterioration with both lower FAB and lower MMSE, although the confidence intervals crossed 1.0. MMSE was compressed against its ceiling, whereas FAB retained discriminative range, enabling finer-grained patient differentiation. Confirmation in larger multicenter cohorts is warranted.

Bilimsel değerlendirme

01

Araştırma sorusu

Sorunun kapsamı orijinal çalışma üzerinden değerlendirilir.

02

Yöntem ve örneklem

Çalışma tasarımı ve örneklem için kaynak makaleyi kontrol edin.

03

Temel bulgular

Bu kayıt için editoryal olarak onaylanmış bulgu özeti henüz yayımlanmadı.

04

Sınırlılıklar

Sonuçların genellenebilirliği, yanlılık ve klinik anlamı ayrıca incelenmelidir.

Bibliyografik veriden yöntem, örneklem veya klinik sonuç çıkarımı yapılmaz.