SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Correction of alternative splicing of tau in frontotemporal dementia and parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17.

J Biol Chem · 2001-09-17

DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m105113200PMID: 11560926

Check source for accessJournal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Mutations in the human tau gene cause frontotemporal dementia and Parkinsonism associated with chromosome 17 (FTDP-17). One of the major disease mechanisms in FTDP-17 is the increased inclusion of tau exon 10 during pre-mRNA splicing. Here we show that modified oligonucleotides directed against the tau exon 10 splice junctions suppress inclusion of tau exon 10. The effect is mediated by the formation of a stable pre-mRNA-oligonucleotide hybrid, which blocks access of the splicing machinery to the pre-mRNA. Correction of tau splicing occurs in a tau minigene system and in endogenous tau RNA in neuronal pheochromocytoma cells and is specific to exon 10 of the tau gene. Antisense oligonucleotide-mediated exclusion of exon 10 has a physiological effect by increasing the ratio of protein lacking the microtubule-binding domain encoded by exon 10. As a consequence, the microtubule cytoskeleton becomes destabilized and cell morphology is altered. Our results demonstrate that alternative splicing defects of tau as found in FTDP-17 patients can be corrected by application of antisense oligonucleotides. These findings provide a tool to study specific tau isoforms in vivo and might lead to a novel therapeutic strategy for FTDP-17.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.