SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Investigating the receptor-independent neuroprotective mechanisms of nicotine in mitochondria.

J Biol Chem · 2005-06-27

DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m504664200PMID: 15985439

Check source for accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Although nicotine has been associated with a decreased risk of developing Parkinson disease, the underlying mechanisms are still unclear. By using isolated brain mitochondria, we found that nicotine inhibited N-methyl-4-phenylpyridine (MPP(+)) and calcium-induced mitochondria high amplitude swelling and cytochrome c release from intact mitochondria. Intra-mitochondria redox state was also maintained by nicotine, which could be attributed to an attenuation of mitochondria permeability transition. Further investigation revealed that nicotine did not prevent MPP(+)- or calcium-induced mitochondria membrane potential loss, but instead decreased the electron leak at the site of respiratory chain complex I. In the presence of mecamylamine hydrochloride, a nonselective nicotinic acetylcholine receptor inhibitor, nicotine significantly postponed mitochondria swelling and cytochrome c release induced by a mixture of neurotoxins (MPP(+) and 6-hydroxydopamine) in SH-SY5Y cells, suggesting that there is a receptor-independent nicotine-mediated neuroprotective effect of nicotine. These results show that interaction of nicotine with mitochondria respiratory chain together with its antioxidant effects should be considered in the neuroprotective effects of nicotine.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.