SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

GPNN: power studies and applications of a neural network method for detecting gene-gene interactions in studies of human disease.

BMC Bioinformatics · 2006-01-25

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-7-39PMID: 16436204

Open accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; research-article; Evaluation Study; Journal Article; Research Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundThe identification and characterization of genes that influence the risk of common, complex multifactorial disease primarily through interactions with other genes and environmental factors remains a statistical and computational challenge in genetic epidemiology. We have previously introduced a genetic programming optimized neural network (GPNN) as a method for optimizing the architecture of a neural network to improve the identification of gene combinations associated with disease risk. The goal of this study was to evaluate the power of GPNN for identifying high-order gene-gene interactions. We were also interested in applying GPNN to a real data analysis in Parkinson's disease.ResultsWe show that GPNN has high power to detect even relatively small genetic effects (2-3% heritability) in simulated data models involving two and three locus interactions. The limits of detection were reached under conditions with very small heritability (ConclusionThese results indicate that GPNN may be a useful pattern recognition approach for detecting gene-gene and gene-environment interactions.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.