SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Identification of L-ferritin in neuromelanin granules of the human substantia nigra: a targeted proteomics approach.

Mol Cell Proteomics · 2009-03-24

DOI: 10.1074/mcp.m900006-mcp200PMID: 19318681

Check source for accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; research-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

In the pigmented dopaminergic neurons of the human substantia nigra pars compacta the system relevant in iron storage is the polymer neuromelanin (NM). Although in most cells this function is mainly accomplished by ferritin, this protein complex appears not to be expressed in NM-containing neurons. Nevertheless the conceivable presence of iron-storing proteins as part of the NM granules has recently been discussed on the basis of Mössbauer spectroscopy and synchrotron x-ray microspectroscopy. Intriguingly by combining subcellular fractionation of NM granules, peptide sequencing via tandem mass spectrometry, and the additional confirmation by multiple reaction monitoring and immunogold labeling for electron microscopy, L-ferritin could now be unambiguously identified and localized in NM granules for the first time. This finding not only supports direct evidence for a regulatory role of L-ferritin in neuroectodermal cell pigmentation but also integrates a new player within a complicated network governing iron homeostasis in the dopamine neurons of the human substantia nigra. Thus our finding entails far reaching implications especially when considering etiopathogenetic aspects of Parkinson disease.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.