Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
A number of studies suggest that the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) impairment may underlie neuronal death in Parkinson's disease. Celastrol is a neuroprotective agent with anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties. The aim of this study was to determine whether celastrol may exert neuroprotective effects both in vitro and in vivo under conditions of the lactacystin-induced UPS inhibition. In the in vitro study, mouse primary cortical neurons and neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells were incubated with lactacystin for 48 h (2.5 and 10 μg/ml, respectively). The animal study was performed on male Wistar rats injected unilaterally with lactacystin (5 μg/2 μl) into the substantia nigra (SN) pars compacta. In the in vitro study, we did not found any protective effects of celastrol, given either in the pre- or co-treatment mode. Moreover, in the higher concentrations, celastrol itself reduced cell viability, and enhanced the lactacystin-induced cell death in both types of cells. In the in vivo study, none of the celastrol doses (0.3-3 mg/kg) attenuated the lactacystin-induced decrease in the level of dopamine (DA) and its metabolites or protected nigral dopaminergic neurons against the lactacystin-induced degeneration. The highest celastrol dose potentiated the lactacystin-induced decrease in the level of DA and its metabolites in the lesioned striatum, and accelerated the lactacystin-induced increase in the oxidative and total metabolism of DA. Moreover, when given alone, this dose of celastrol bilaterally decreased the number and/or density of dopaminergic neurons in the SN. Our results demonstrate that celastrol does not induce neuroprotective effects under conditions of UPS inhibition.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.