SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Causes and factors related to dopamine agonist withdrawal in Parkinson's disease.

Brain Behav · 2016-05-05

DOI: 10.1002/brb3.453PMID: 27247848

Open accessarticle-commentary; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundAlthough dopamine agonists (DAs) are useful in Parkinson's disease (PD), they are not frequently used in elderly patients due to adverse effects. However, there is a lack of evidence because few elderly PD patients are enrolled in clinical trials.Aims of the studyThe aims of this study were to analyze the reasons of DA withdrawal (DAW) in a group of PD patients in clinical practice and to identify the related factors. Specifically, we studied the effect of age, comorbidity, and polypharmacy as potential risk factors for DAW.MethodsA retrospective chart review of the follow-up (from May, 2012 to March, 2015) of a subgroup of PD patients receiving a DA (n = 68; 60.3% males, 69.3 ± 9.2 years old) from a cohort (n = 150) previously studied in detail in 2012 was used to identify predictive factors of DAW.ResultsThe DAW percentage was 18.2% (12/66; follow-up of 690.2 ± 232.6 days). DAW causes were cognitive impairment (3), reduction therapy (3), hallucinations (2), dyskinesia (2), and excessive diurnal somnolence (2). Only a higher levodopa daily dose (HR 1.003; 95% CI 1.001-1.006; P = 0.044) was an independent predictor of DAW after adjustment for other explanatory variables.ConclusionsThe frequency of DAW was low. Advanced age alone is not a contraindication to the administration of DAs.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.