SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Impaired interhemispheric synchrony in Parkinson's disease with depression.

Sci Rep · 2016-06-06

DOI: 10.1038/srep27477PMID: 27265427

Open accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; research-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

The alterations of interhemispheric resting-state functional connectivity (FC) in Parkinson's disease (PD) with depression remain unclear, so we aimed to explore the differences of interhemispheric FC between PD with and without depression. Twenty-one depressed PD (DPD) patients, 49 non-depressed PD (NDPD) patients and 50 matched healthy controls (HC) participated in this study. Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data were analyzed with the voxel-mirrored homotopic connectivity (VMHC) approach. The DPD patients showed lower VMHC values in the bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and calcarine cortex compared to both NDPD and HC groups, and further receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) analyses revealed that the VMHC in these two brain areas could be used as biomarkers to distinguish DPD from NDPD and from HC. The pooled PD patients (both DPD and NDPD) exhibited decreased VMHC in the bilateral putamen, middle occipital gyrus (MOG), postcentral gyrus (PoCG), paracentral lobule (PCL) and cerebellum posterior lobe when compared with HC. Decreased VMHC values within the DLPFC and calcarine cortex appeared to be unique features for DPD and might be used as potential neuroimaging markers to distinguish DPD patients from NDPD and HC groups. These findings may underlie the neural mechanisms of depression in PD.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.