SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Insights from mathematical modeling for convection-enhanced intraputamenal delivery of GDNF.

Med Biol Eng Comput · 2017-05-11

DOI: 10.1007/s11517-017-1650-xPMID: 28493093

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) is a potential therapy for Parkinson's disease (PD) promoting survival and functional recovery of dopaminergic neurons when delivered to the degenerated striatum. To study the aspects of intraputamenal delivery of GDNF, a mathematical model of recombinant methionyl human GDNF (r-metHuGDNF) convection in the human putamen has been developed. The convection-enhanced delivery infusions of r-metHuGDNF were simulated at rates up to 5 μL/min. The high-rate infusions (≥1 μL/min) permit rapid and uniform distribution of drug with up to 75% of the distribution volume having a concentration within 5% of the infusate concentration. No relevant differences in distribution at infusion rates of 3 and 5 μL/min were found. The patterns of GDNF distribution were analyzed in relation to the anatomy of the posterior dorsal putamen, and a cylindrical shape was found to be preferable considering risks of target overflow. A magnetic resonance (MR) tracer Gd-DTPA (Magnevist®) was evaluated as a surrogate in clinical studies, and the most accurate prediction of GDNF distribution was calculated immediately after infusion. The clearance of GDNF from the striatum is confirmed to be slow, with a half-life of ca. 19 h.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.