SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Falling Direction can Predict the Mechanism of Recurrent Falls in Advanced Parkinson's Disease.

Sci Rep · 2017-06-20

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-04302-7PMID: 28634343

Open accessresearch-article; Journal Article; Observational StudyOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Falls are a common and disabling symptom in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). For prevention, it is important to understand the pathophysiology of falls in PD patients, but the predictors for the possible mechanisms underlying such falls have not been clearly elucidated. In this prospective observational study, we investigated the implications of falling direction to predict the mechanisms of recurrent falls in PD patients. We enrolled 62 recurrent fallers with PD and divided them into two groups according to the main falling directions: 45 PD fallers who fell forward (forward fallers), and 17 PD fallers who fell in the other directions (non-forward fallers). Although there was no difference in demographic data, parkinsonism, or frontal lobe function, forward fallers showed more severe falls and tended to fall during walking or turning, while non-forward fallers usually fell during sitting/standing or turning. Additionally, forward fallers revealed higher score on a freezing of gait (FOG) questionnaire. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that FOG was associated with falling forward, while balance impairment, akinetic-rigid subtype, and neuropsychiatric symptoms were associated with falling into the other directions. Our results indicate that FOG and balance impairment are two major mechanisms for recurrent falling in PD patients, and falling direction is an important predictor for these mechanisms.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.