Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
ObjectivesLevodopa is the most effective therapy for treating Parkinson's disease (PD); however, side effects such as dyskinesias and motor fluctuations may occur after some years of its usage. The aims of this study were to assess the frequency of and factors associated with motor complications among PD patients on levodopa treatment.MethodsIn a cross-sectional study carried out in 2010-2013, clinical data and treatment details were collected. Logistic regression expressed by odd ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) was conducted to examine the effects of several independent variables on the occurrence of motor complications.ResultsA total of 455 patients were enrolled, among whom 374 were on levodopa. Analysis was performed in 328 patients whose exact duration of levodopa treatment was known. Among patients included in the analysis, 25.9% experienced motor complications; of these, 21% had dyskinesias and 20.1% had motor fluctuations. Based on logistic regression, statistically significant factors associated with the occurrence of motor complications were younger age at onset of the disease, higher levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD), shorter time to levodopa initiation, and akinetic-rigid dominant phenotype of PD.ConclusionsThis study suggests that postponing the start of levodopa therapy and maintaining low daily doses of levodopa might reduce the risk of motor complications. Our results confirm that due to higher risk of motor complications, effectively treating patients with akinetic-rigid dominant phenotype of PD might be more challenging than for patients whose dominant symptom is tremor.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.