Long-term Monitoring Gait Analysis Using a Wearable Device in Daily Lives of Patients with Parkinson's Disease: The Efficacy of Selegiline H

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to assess quantitatively the gait disorders in the daily lives of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) using with a newly developed portable gait rhythmogram (PGR), which has a trunk-mounted acceleration sensor and automatic gait-detection algorithm.MethodsUsing the PGR, we recorded the daily walking profiles of 14 PD patients before and after the addition or increase in dose of an MAO-B inhibitor (selegiline, average dose: 4.0 mg/day) as part of their medicine regimen, and evaluated their gait using the unified Parkinson's disease rating scale (UPDRS) and scores from a freezing of gait (FOG) questionnaire.ResultsBefore treatment with selegiline, the overall movements per 24 h was decreased below 0.41 m/s2 (mean - 1.5 SD) in eight patients. The mean gait acceleration was decreased below 1.94 m/s2 (mean - 2 SD) in 10 patients. The slope of the linear regression line was increased to 1.6 (mean + 1.5 SD) in eight patients. The cadence was increased to 124 steps/min (mean + 1.5 SD) in four patients. Based on continuous PGR recordings in the daily lives of the patients for 24 h, the addition or increase in dose of selegiline increased the amplitudes of gait accelerations in 4 of 10 patients (40.0%), widened the range of gait accelerations in 5 of 8 patients (62.5%), diminished the cadence in 4 of 4 patients (100%), and diminished the fluctuations in gait throughout the day in 12 of 14 patients (85.7%). The UPDRS III and FOG scores significantly improved after the addition or increase in dose of selegiline (p p ConclusionImprovements in the gait fluctuations of PD patients after the addition or increase in dose of selegiline were detected using the PGR in the daily lives of the patients for 24 h. The PGR had a higher sensitivity for detecting the improvements than UPDRS scores.

Scientific assessment

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.