SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Biomarker repurposing: Therapeutic drug monitoring of serum theophylline offers a potential diagnostic biomarker of Parkinson's disease.

PLoS One · 2018-07-25

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201260PMID: 30044870

Open accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; research-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Caffeine has been considered a neuroprotective agent against Parkinson's disease (PD). Recent metabolomic analysis showed that levels of caffeine and its metabolites were decreased in sera from patients with PD compared with those from healthy controls. We focused on theophylline, which is one of the primary caffeine metabolites, as a candidate biomarker of PD because: (1) its serum level can be measured in hospital laboratories by standardized immunoassay kits for therapeutic drug monitoring and (2) because it is less markedly affected by caffeine intake. This was a pilot study to measure the levels of theophylline in sera of 31 patients with PD and 33 age-matched disease controls using an immunoassay kit. We confirmed the previous finding of significantly lower levels of serum theophylline in the PD group compared with control group (PD: 0.07±0.09 μg/mL, control: 0.18±0.24 μg/mL, p<0.05). Using such an approach of applying known medical biomarkers for neurodegenerative diseases may allow us to skip the process from the discovery phase to clinical application, and subsequently shorten the period of time necessary for biomarker development.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.