SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Subjective Vertical Position Allows Prediction of Postural Deterioration in Patients with Parkinson's Disease.

Parkinsons Dis · 2019-04-02

DOI: 10.1155/2019/1875435PMID: 31061695

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundWe believe that, in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), a forward-directed increase in the subjective vertical position (SV) leads to prolonged worsening of forward flexion of the trunk (FFT) mainly because the body adjusts to the SV. We conducted a study to clarify the relation between the SV angle, FFT angle, and various other clinical measures by comparing baseline values against values obtained 1 year later.MethodsA total of 39 PD patients (mean age, 71.9 ± 10.1 years; disease duration, 7.2 ± 5.4 years; modified Hoehn & Yahr (mH&Y) score, 2.6 ± 0.7) were enrolled. The Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale score, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score, mH&Y score, FFT angle, SV angle, and levodopa-equivalent dose (LED) were assessed at the time of enrollment (baseline evaluation) and 1 year later.ResultsEighteen patients (46%) complied with the protocol and completed the study. Significant increases were observed in the 1-year SV angle (p=0.02), MMSE score (p=0.008), and LED (p=0.001) compared to baseline values. Correlation was observed between the baseline SV angle and baseline and 1-year FFT angles (r=0.64,  p=0.008 and r=0.58,  p=0.012, respectively) and between the 1-year SV angle and 1-year FFT angle (r=0.63,  p=0.005).ConclusionOur data suggest that the SV contributes to increased FFT.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.