SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

The influence of initial symptoms on phenotypes in spinocerebellar ataxia type 3.

Mol Genet Genomic Med · 2019-05-23

DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.719PMID: 31124318

Open accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; research-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundSpinocerebellar ataxia type 3 (SCA3) is a rare, inherited form of ataxia that leads to progressive neurodegeneration. The initial symptoms could affect clinical phenotypes in neurodegenerative diseases, such as Parkinson's disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. However, the contribution of initial symptoms to the phenotypes of SCA3 has been scarcely investigated.MethodsIn the present study, 143 SCA3 patients from China were recruited and divided into two groups of gait-onset and non-gait-onset. For determining the influences of initial symptoms on age at onset (AAO), the severity and progression of ataxia, and the possible factors affecting the initial symptoms, multivariable linear regression, and multivariate logistic regression were performed.ResultsWe found that the frequency of gait-onset was 87.41%, and the frequency of non-gait-onset was 12.59% (diplopia: 7.69%, dysarthria: 4.20%, dystonia: 0.70%). Compared to the non-gait-onset group, the gait-onset group had significantly more severe ataxia (p = 0.046), while the initial symptoms had no effect on AAO (p = 0.109) and progression of ataxia (p = 0.265). We failed to find the existence of any factors affecting initial symptoms.ConclusionThese findings collectively suggested that initial symptoms influenced phenotypes in SCA3 and that neurodegeneration in different parts of brain may induce different disease severity in SCA3.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.