SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Depression, quality of life, activities of daily living, and subjective memory after deep brain stimulation in Parkinson disease-A reliable change index analysis.

Int J Geriatr Psychiatry · 2019-08-06

DOI: 10.1002/gps.5184PMID: 31368144

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

ObjectivesIn the field of Parkinson disease (PD) research, many studies have shown that deep brain stimulation (DBS) can soften side effects, which arise during long-term medical therapy. This study focuses on the changes in depressive symptoms, quality of life (with the subdivisions physical and mental health), activities of daily living, and subjective memory functioning in PD patients testing the baseline and the outcome 1 year after DBS.MethodsFor the first time, the reliable change index (RCI) methodology was applied to compare PD-DBS patients (n = 22) with best medically treated PD patients (PD-BMT; n = 28), subjects with mild cognitive impairment (MCI, n = 43) and healthy controls (n = 25) in the above-mentioned domains. The used questionnaires included the revised Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II), the Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36), the Bayer Activities of Daily Living Scale (B-ADL), and the Forgetfulness Assessment Inventory (FAI).ResultsThe reliable change indices show high constant or improved results of the PD-DBS patients in the domains subjective memory (85.7%-100.0%), activities of daily living (60.0%-90.0%), physical health summary (77.8%), depressive symptoms (61.9%), and mental health summary (50.0%) in comparison with the PD-BMT, MCI, and control group.ConclusionsDBS is an established alternative to best medical treatment of PD. The comparisons between the PD-DBS and PD-BMT groups do suggest that the domains mental health, depressive symptoms, and physical health benefit most, while the domains activities of daily living and subjective memory functioning are rather constant. Nevertheless, further research is needed to identify mechanisms and predictors that lead to improvement in individual cases.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.