Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
BackgroundPrevious investigations have revealed that miR-563 is associated with a number of diseases including the ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament, Parkinson's disease or drug resistance to leukemia. Yet, the role of miR-563 and its molecular mechanism in the initiation and progression of cancers has not been previously explored. In this study, we aimed to provide clues to the function of miR-563 and its direct target in lung cancer.MethodsOnline informatics software was applied to predict the target genes of miR-563. MiR-563 targeting LIN28B was evaluated through the luciferase reporter gene analysis. The effect of miR-563 on LIN28B at the level of RNA and protein was detected using RT-PCR and immunoblotting. The ability of proliferation of human lung cancer A549 was examined by MTT assay. RNA interference targeting LIN28B was examined through immunoblotting. The level of miR-563 and LIN28B and their correlation were analyzed in 27 cases of lung tumor tissues by real-time PCR.ResultsOncogenic LIN28B was identified as one of the target genes of miR-563 in lung cancer cells. MiR-563 dose-dependently decreased the LIN28B RNA level and subsequently its protein level in the cells. Cell proliferation was suppressed by ectopic miR-563 expression and was accelerated after endogenous miR-563 was knocked down by its inhibitor. However, silence in LIN28B reversed promotion of cell proliferation by the inhibition of miR-563. In lung cancer tissues, miR-563 was decreased and negative correlation of miR-563 and LIN28B was shown.ConclusionMiR-563 plays a tumor suppressive role in lung cancer progression via targeting oncogenic LIN28B.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.