SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

A Multimodal Approach to the Quantification of Kinetic Tremor in Parkinson's Disease.

Sensors (Basel) · 2019-12-28

DOI: 10.3390/s20010184PMID: 31905697

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Parkinson's disease results in motor impairment that deteriorates patients' quality of life. One of the symptoms negatively interfering with daily activities is kinetic tremor which should be measured to monitor the outcome of therapy. A new instrumented method of quantification of the kinetic tremor is proposed, based on the analysis of circles drawn on a digitizing tablet by a patient. The aim of this approach is to obtain a tremor scoring equivalent to that performed by trained clinicians. Models are trained with the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method to predict the tremor scores on the basis of the parameters computed from the patients' drawings. Signal parametrization is derived from both expert knowledge and the response of an artificial neural network to the raw data, thus the approach was named multimodal. The fitted models are eventually combined into model ensembles that provide aggregated scores of the kinetic tremor captured in the drawings. The method was verified with a set of clinical data acquired from 64 Parkinson's disease patients. Automated and objective quantification of the kinetic tremor with the presented approach yielded promising results, as the Pearson's correlations between the visual ratings of tremor and the model predictions ranged from 0.839 to 0.890 in the best-performing models.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.