SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

The Effects of Dog Walking on Gait and Mobility in People with Parkinson Disease: A Pilot Study.

Int J Environ Res Public Health · 2020-02-28

DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17051549PMID: 32121195

Open accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; research-article; Journal Article; Observational StudyOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

The objective of this study was to assess the effects of dog walking on gait and mobility in people with Parkinson disease (PD). This single-group, single-session, observational pilot study included nineteen participants with PD in Hoehn and Yahr stages II (n = 9) and III (n = 10). Primary measures were a gait analysis and the Timed Up and Go (TUG). Three trials of two conditions (walking with and without a dog) were completed. Walking with a dog resulted in slower gait velocity (mean difference = 0.11 m/s, p = 0.003, d = 0.77), shorter step length (left: mean difference = 7.11 cm, p = 0.000; right: mean difference = 3.05, p = 0.01), and stride length (left: mean difference = 7.52, p = 0.003; right: mean difference = 8.74, p = 0.001). The base of support was more narrowed (Z = -2.13, p = 0.03), with increased double limb stance time (left: Z = -2.89, p = 0.004; right: Z = -2.59, p = 0.01). Walking with a dog caused slower TUG times (mean difference = -1.67, p = 0.000) and increased number of steps (Z = -3.73, p = 0.000). No significant change shown in step time (left: mean difference = -0.001, p = 0.81; right: mean difference = 0.002, p = 0.77) or cadence (Z = -1.67, p = 0.10). In conclusion, there was an overall decline of gait parameters in people with PD when walking with a dog.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.