SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

L-dopa treatment increases oscillatory power in the motor cortex of Parkinson's disease patients.

Neuroimage Clin · 2020-04-20

DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102255PMID: 32361482

Open accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; research-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a movement disorder caused by dopaminergic neurodegeneration. Levodopa (L-dopa) is an effective medication for alleviating motor symptoms in PD that has been shown previously to reduce subcortical beta (13-30 Hz) oscillations. How L-dopa influences oscillations in the motor cortex is unclear. In this study, 21 PD patients were recorded with magnetoencephalography (MEG) in L-dopa ON and OFF states. Oscillatory components of resting-state power spectra were compared between the two states and the significant effect was localized using beamforming. Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) III akinesia and rigidity sub-scores for the most affected hemibody were correlated with source power values for the contralateral hemisphere. An L-dopa-induced power increase was found over the central sensors significant in the 18-30 Hz range (F(1,20)  > 14.8, PFWE corr (2, 19) = 4.9, pone-tailed = 0.02, R2 = 0.2). Power in the same range was also inversely correlated with combined akinesia and rigidity scores in the L-dopa OFF state (F(2, 19) = 9.2, ptwo-tailed = 0.007, R2 = 0.33) but not in the L-dopa ON state (F(2, 19) = 0.27, ptwo-tailed = 0.6, R2 = 0.01). These results suggest that the role of motor cortical beta oscillations in PD is distinct from that of subcortical beta.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.