SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Current and Desired Quality of Life in People with Parkinson's Disease: the Calman Gap Increases with Depression.

J Clin Med · 2020-05-15

DOI: 10.3390/jcm9051496PMID: 32429254

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Hopes and expectations often differ from current experiences. This so-called Calman gap influences quality of life (QoL). We investigated this gap in 77 elderly patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), 25 patients with epilepsy, and 39 age-matched healthy older adults using a novel QoL questionnaire, where current and desired states were marked on a visual analogue scale. We studied the relationships between (1) epidemiological factors, (2) current and desired QoL, as well as the difference between the latter two. Current QoL was determined by depression, education level, living situation, and condition (PD, epilepsy, control). In contrast, desired QoL was essentially determined by the presence of a disease (condition), education level, and age, but not by depression. In particular, the presence of PD, lower education level, and higher age was correlated with lower expectations. In patients with PD, the gap between the current and desired QoL was largest for pain and physical functions. Accordingly, the significant effects of depression were observed only for mean current QoL, but not for desired QoL. Therefore, depression mainly influences current but not desired QoL in patients with PD. Depressed patients with PD had significantly worse QoL than PD patients without depression, although they both had almost the same desired QoL and hence, depressed PD patients had a larger Calman gap between current and desired QoL.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.