NeuralCipher Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
Background and purposel-DOPA-induced dyskinesia (LID) is considered a major complication in the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). Buspirone (5-HT1A partial agonist) have shown promising results in the treatment of PD and LID, however no 5-HT-based treatment has been approved in PD. The present study was aimed to investigate how the substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr) is affected by buspirone and whether it is a good target to study 5-HT antidyskinetic treatments.Experimental approachBuspirone was studied using in vivo single-unit, electrocorticogram, local field potential recordings along with microdialysis and immunohistochemistry in naïve/sham, 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA)-lesioned or 6-OHDA-lesioned and l-DOPA-treated (6-OHDA/l-DOPA) rats.Key resultsLocal buspirone inhibited SNr neuron activity in all groups. However, systemic buspirone reduced burst activity in 6-OHDA-lesioned rats (with or without l-DOPA treatment), whereas 8-OH-DPAT, a full 5-HT1A agonist induced larger inhibitory effects in sham animals. Neither buspirone nor 8-OH-DPAT markedly modified the low-frequency oscillatory activity in the SNr or synchronization within the SNr with the cortex. In addition, local perfusion of buspirone increased GABA and glutamate release in the SNr of naïve and 6-OHDA-lesioned rats but no effect in 6-OHDA/l-DOPA rats. In the 6-OHDA/l-DOPA group, increased 5-HT transporter and decreased 5-HT1A receptor expression was found.Conclusions and implicationsThe effects of buspirone in SNr are influenced by dopamine loss and l-DOPA treatment. The present results suggest that the regulation of burst activity of the SNr induced by DA loss may be a good target to test new drugs for the treatment of PD and LID.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.