SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Appendectomy, Tonsillectomy and Parkinson's Disease Risk: A Swedish Register-Based Study.

Front Neurol · 2020-06-05

DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00510PMID: 32595591

Open accessbrief-report; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Introduction: The gut-brain hypothesis proposes that Parkinson's disease (PD) pathology may start in the gut and later spread to the brain in a prion-like manner. As PD pathology is redundant in the appendix and tonsils, which are important gut-associated lymphoid tissues, we examined whether appendectomy and tonsillectomy were associated with later PD risk. Methods: The nested case-control study included 78,650 PD patients born in 1900-1980 and with a diagnosis of PD between 1964 and 2010. For each PD patient, we randomly selected 40 non-PD controls individually matched for sex and year of birth at the date of PD diagnosis. Appendectomy and tonsillectomy before PD diagnosis were ascertained from the Swedish Patient Register from 1964 onward. We calculated odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using conditional logistic regression adjusting for country of birth, highest achieved education, COPD, comorbidity index, and number of hospital visits. Results: Overall, we found 16% lower risk of PD linked to previous appendectomy (OR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.80-0.88) and 8% lower risk of PD linked to previous tonsillectomy, although not statistically significant (OR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.81-1.04). A 7 and 15% lower risk of PD was also noted ≥20 years after appendectomy and tonsillectomy, respectively. Similar associations were observed for men and women but were stronger for PD diagnosed after age 60. Conclusion: Appendectomy and potentially also tonsillectomy were associated with a lower risk PD. A potential mechanism may involve surgical removal of alpha-synuclein redundancy in the appendix and tonsils.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.