Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
This study aimed to explore the protective effects of Wenshen-Yanggan decoction on dopaminergic (DA) neuron injury in a rotenone-induced mouse model with chronic Parkinson's disease (PD) and explore its mechanism of action. Ultraperformance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) was used to measure the content of six main components in the Wenshen-Yanggan decoction. The chronic PD mouse model was established by treating 10-month-old healthy wild C57BL/6 male mice with rotenone 30 mg/kg/day for 28 days in succession. The pole test and rotarod test were applied to detect the rescue effect of Wenshen-Yanggan decoction in high, medium, and low dosages, respectively, on PD-like behaviors in mice with chronic PD. The protective effect of Wenshen-Yanggan decoction on the mesencephalic nigrostriatal DA neuron injury was determined employing tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) immunofluorescence staining. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was adopted to measure the inflammatory cytokines in serum, including TNF-α (tumor necrosis factor-alpha), IFN-γ (interferon gamma), NF-κB (nuclear factor kappa-B), and IL-1β (interleukin-1 beta). Western blotting was performed to quantify the expression of phosphorylated c-Jun N-terminal kinase (p-JNK), cleaved caspase-3, B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2), and NF-κB in the brain. Our results showed that the Wenshen-Yanggan decoction in high, medium, and low dosages reduced the turning time of mice (P P P P P P P P α-syn expression in the PD model. Moreover, the decoction in high dosage significantly inhibited the expression of p-JNK, cleaved caspase-3, and NF-κB in the midbrain of PD mice (P P P P α, IFN-γ, NF-κB, and IL-1β in the serum (P P P P Wenshen-Yanggan decoction could protect mice from rotenone-induced chronic PD, which might be related to the reduction of the DA neuron apoptosis via suppressing the inflammatory reaction and the neuronal apoptosis pathway.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.