SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Visual hallucinations and inferior longitudinal fasciculus in Parkinson's disease.

Brain Behav · 2020-10-20

DOI: 10.1002/brb3.1883PMID: 33078912

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

IntroductionWe investigated whether disruption of the inferior longitudinal fasciculus and inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus are associated with visual hallucinations in Parkinson's disease (PD).MethodsSixty consecutive right-handed patients with PD with and without visual hallucinations were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. Diffusion tensor imaging was acquired by 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging. We measured fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity of the bilateral inferior longitudinal fasciculus and inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus using diffusion tensor tractography analysis software.ResultsSeventeen patients with PD had visual hallucinations; these patients tended to have lower fractional anisotropy and higher mean diffusivity values in all fasciculi than did patients without visual hallucinations. A univariate logistic analysis showed that the presence of visual hallucinations was significantly associated with lower fractional anisotropy and higher mean diffusivity of the left inferior longitudinal fasciculus, and lower Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores. A multivariable logistic analysis adjusted by MMSE scores and disease duration showed a significant association between the presence of visual hallucinations and fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity values of the left inferior longitudinal fasciculus.ConclusionsOur results suggest that disruption of left inferior longitudinal fasciculus integrity is associated with visual hallucinations in patients with PD, independent of cognitive impairment and disease duration.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.