SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Tau pathology associates with in vivo cortical thinning in Lewy body disorders.

Ann Clin Transl Neurol · 2020-10-27

DOI: 10.1002/acn3.51183PMID: 33108692

Open accessresearch-article; Journal Article; Research Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

ObjectivesTo investigate the impact of Alzheimer's disease (AD) co-pathology on an in vivo structural measure of neurodegeneration in Lewy body disorders (LBD).MethodsWe studied 72 LBD patients (Parkinson disease (PD) = 2, PD-MCI = 25, PD with dementia = 10, dementia with Lewy bodies = 35) with either CSF analysis or neuropathological examination and structural MRI during life. The cohort was divided into those harboring significant AD co-pathology, either at autopsy (intermediate/high AD neuropathologic change) or with CSF signature indicating AD co-pathology (t-tau/Aβ1-42  > 0.3) (LBD+AD, N = 19), and those without AD co-pathology (LBD-AD, N = 53). We also included a reference group of 25 patients with CSF biomarker-confirmed amnestic AD. We investigated differences in MRI cortical thickness estimates between groups, and in the 21 autopsied LBD patients (LBD-AD = 14, LBD+AD = 7), directly tested the association between antemortem MRI and post-mortem burdens of tau, Aβ, and alpha-synuclein using digital histopathology in five representative neocortical regions.ResultsThe LBD+AD group was characterized by cortical thinning in anterior/medial and lateral temporal regions (P InterpretationLBD+AD is characterized by temporal neocortical thinning on MRI, and cortical thinning directly correlated with post-mortem histopathologic burden of tau, suggesting that tau pathology influences the pattern of neurodegeneration in LBD.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.