Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
BackgroundClinical scales such as the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) cannot be used to study ataxia at home or to assess daily fluctuations. The objective of the current study was to develop a video-based instrument, SARAhome , for measuring ataxia severity easily and independently at home.MethodsBased on feasibility of self-application, we selected 5 SARA items (gait, stance, speech, nose-finger test, fast alternating hand movements) for SARAhome (range, 0-28). We compared SARAhome items with total SARA scores in 526 patients with spinocerebellar ataxia types 1, 2, 3, and 6 from the EUROSCA natural history study. To prospectively validate the SARAhome , we directly compared the self-applied SARAhome and the conventional SARA in 50 ataxia patients. To demonstrate feasibility of independent home recordings in a pilot study, 12 ataxia patients were instructed to obtain a video each morning and evening over a period of 14 days. All videos were rated offline by a trained rater.ResultsSARAhome extracted from the EUROSCA baseline data was highly correlated with conventional SARA (r = 0.9854, P home was highly correlated with the conventional SARA (r = 0.9254, P home scores ranged from 1 to 5.5.ConclusionThe SARAhome and the conventional SARA are highly correlated. Application at home is feasible. There was a considerable degree of intraindividual variability of the SARAhome scores. © 2021 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.