SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Levodopa affects spike and local field synchronisation in the pedunculopontine nucleus of a rat model of Parkinson's disease.

Aging (Albany NY) · 2021-02-26

DOI: 10.18632/aging.202585PMID: 33639616

Open accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; research-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

The pedunculopontine nucleus (PPN) undergoes significant anatomic and electrophysiological alterations in Parkinson's disease (PD), severely impacting locomotion. However, the effect of 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) lesion and levodopa (L-DOPA) therapy on the relationships between spike activities and local field potential (LFP) within the PPN is not well-understood. Synchronisation between the spike activity of individual neurones and LFP of neuronal ensembles is a crucial problem in the pathogenesis of PD. In this study, LFP signals and spikes in the PPN of rats in control, lesioned, and L-DOPA groups were recorded synchronously with a multi-unit electrical signal acquisition system and analysed for their coherence value, spike-field coherence, and phase-lock relationship. The spike-LFP relationship in the PPN was markedly increased in specific frequency bands because of the 6-OHDA lesion but differed depending on the animal locomotion state and neuronal type. L-DOPA had a limited therapeutic effect on the 6-OHDA-induced increase in the coherence value. Our study demonstrates that the PPN spike-LFP relationship is involved in the pathogenesis of PD and is critical for the effects of L-DOPA, providing a basis for the clinical treatment of refractory PD symptoms.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.