NeuralCipher Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
BackgroundConsecutive adult neurogenesis is a well-known phenomenon in the ventricular-subventricular zone of the lateral wall of the lateral ventricles (V-SVZ) and has been controversially discussed in so-called "non-neurogenic" brain areas such as the periventricular regions (PVRs) of the aqueduct and the fourth ventricle. Dopamine is a known modulator of adult neural stem cell (aNSC) proliferation and dopaminergic neurogenesis in the olfactory bulb, though a possible interplay between local dopaminergic neurodegeneration and induction of aNSC proliferation in mid/hindbrain PVRs is currently enigmatic.Objective/hypothesisTo analyze the influence of chronic-progressive dopaminergic neurodegeneration on both consecutive adult neurogenesis in the PVRs of the V-SVZ and mid/hindbrain aNSCs in two mechanistically different transgenic animal models of Parkinson´s disease (PD).MethodsWe used Thy1-m[A30P]h α synuclein mice and Leu9'Ser hypersensitive α4* nAChR mice to assess the influence of midbrain dopaminergic neuronal loss on neurogenic activity in the PVRs of the V-SVZ, the aqueduct and the fourth ventricle.ResultsIn both animal models, overall proliferative activity in the V-SVZ was not altered, though the proportion of B2/activated B1 cells on all proliferating cells was reduced in the V-SVZ in Leu9'Ser hypersensitive α4* nAChR mice. Putative aNSCs in the mid/hindbrain PVRs are known to be quiescent in vivo in healthy controls, and dopaminergic deficiency did not induce proliferative activity in these regions in both disease models.ConclusionsOur data do not support an activation of endogenous aNSCs in mid/hindbrain PVRs after local dopaminergic neurodegeneration. Spontaneous endogenous regeneration of dopaminergic cell loss through resident aNSCs is therefore unlikely.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.