SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

A Goal Intervention Improves Language Fluency: Evidence from Parkinson's Disease and Healthy Aging.

Medicines (Basel) · 2021-03-22

DOI: 10.3390/medicines8030015PMID: 33810201

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Background: Parkinson's disease [PD] is associated with reduced motor and cognitive initiation, and decreased goal-directed behavior including language generation. The current study investigated a novel goal intervention for language generation impairments in PD patients. Methods: Twenty-one PD patients and 22 healthy controls, matched for gender, age, and education, completed a cognitive baseline and language generation tasks (complex scene descriptions and phonemic/semantic word fluency) with standard and adapted instructions, which implements a target 'goal'. In addition, participants completed self-report questionnaires for apathy and mood. Results: PD patients performed more poorly on two of three language generation tasks. The goal intervention was effective in increasing both the PD patient and healthy control groups' language generation. However, there was no differential benefit of increased goal specificity and difficulty for PD patients. As a group, PD patients reported higher levels of apathy and depression than healthy controls. Specifically, PD patients with executive apathy were more likely to have language generation impairments than PD patients without executive apathy and controls. Apathy subscales and goal benefit were unrelated. Conclusions: The goal intervention was effective for PD patients and older adults, suggesting that enhanced goal specificity and difficulty may benefit individuals with PD or those aging naturally.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.