Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
IntroductionParkinson's disease (PD) patients in chronic levodopa treatment may experience motor and non-motor fluctuations, which may affect their quality of life. Safinamide is a new monoamine oxidase B inhibitor, also exerting a non-dopaminergic effect, recently approved as add-on therapy in fluctuating PD patients.MethodsWe performed a longitudinal prospective study in a cohort of 20 fluctuating PD patients, to test whether safinamide 50 mg may improve non-motor, cognitive, and behavioral symptoms over a 6-month treatment period. At each timepoint, clinical features were assessed by means of validated PD-specific scales. Neuropsychological assessment was performed by exploring all five cognitive domains.ResultsCompared to baseline, significant improvement was found in PD patients at 6-month follow-up in items investigating interest (p = 0.02), motivation (p = 0.02), and urinary disturbances (p = 0.03). Moreover, neuropsychiatric assessment showed a significant decrease in fatigue and apathy scores (p = 0.02 and p = 0.01, respectively). Motor assessment revealed a significant reduction in the total wake-up time spent in OFF state (p = 0.01). Follow-up neuropsychological evaluation did not reveal any change compared to baseline.ConclusionsOur data reveal that, along with motor fluctuation improvement, treatment with safinamide 50 mg may significantly decrease non-motor symptom burden in PD patients. Interestingly, non-dopaminergic mechanisms, such as glutamatergic overdrive, have been demonstrated to play a role in many pathways underlying these symptoms. Thus, we hypothesize that the neurotransmitter receptor-binding profile of safinamide may explain our findings.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.