SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Regulatory miRNA-mRNA Networks in Parkinson's Disease.

Cells · 2021-06-06

DOI: 10.3390/cells10061410PMID: 34204164

Open accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; research-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second-most common neurodegenerative disease, and its pathophysiology is associated with alpha-synuclein accumulation, oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and neuroinflammation. MicroRNAs are small non-coding RNAs that regulate gene expression, and many previous studies have described their dysregulation in plasma, CSF, and in the brain of patients with PD. In this study, we aimed to provide a regulatory network analysis on differentially expressed miRNAs in the brain of patients with PD. Based on our systematic review with a focus on the substantia nigra and the putamen, we found 99 differentially expressed miRNAs in brain samples from patients with PD, which regulate 135 target genes. Five genes associated with neuronal survival (BCL2, CCND1, FOXO3, MYC, and SIRT1) were modulated by dysregulated miRNAs found in the substantia nigra and the putamen of patients with PD. The functional enrichment analysis found FoxO and PI3K-AKT signaling as pathways related to PD. In conclusion, our comprehensive analysis of brain-related miRNA-mRNA regulatory networks in PD showed that mechanisms involving neuronal survival signaling, such as cell cycle control and regulation of autophagy/apoptosis, may be crucial for the neurodegeneration of PD, being a promising way for novel disease-modifying therapies.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.